The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has foreseen a Europe that faces power crunch if Russia completely shuts down gas supplies. It said that the economy of EU countries would face the threat of contraction, even though the impact would vary from country to country.
While the most affected countries may face shortages of up to 40% of normal consumption, they may include the countries in central and eastern Europe — Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic — who may register a gross domestic product decline of up to 6%t amid gas shortages of up to 40% of normal consumption.
In a working paper released on yesterday (Tuesday), the IMF said the effect on Austria, Germany and Italy will also be “significant” but would depend on policy responses, the remaining bottlenecks at the time of the shutdown and the market’s ability to adjust.
Other European countries are not expected to face such constraints and the impact on gross domestic product would be moderate — possibly under 1%, the global body said.
“The impacts, however, could be mitigated by securing alternative supplies and energy sources, easing infrastructure bottlenecks, encouraging energy savings while protecting vulnerable households, and expanding solidarity agreements to share gas across countries,” the authors said in a blog post.
Quoting a draft EU document, Bloomberg opined that halting Russian gas supplies to the EU could potentially reduce the bloc’s GDP by as much as 1.5% if the next winter is severe and the region fails to take preventive measures to save energy.
The EU’s GDP would fall by 0.6% to 1% if the winter is ordinary, the news wire said. Europe is locked in a stand-off with Moscow, its biggest gas supplier, over its military invasion of Ukraine.
The EU is almost certain that Russia will completely shut off supplies to the bloc in response to growing rounds of sanctions. Reuters said on Monday that Russian state-owned energy company Gazprom declared force majeure on gas supplies to at least one major customer in Europe.
This adds to concerns that Russia, which shut down its main Nord Stream 1 pipeline for 10 days starting from July 11 for planned maintenance, will use the opportunity to shut it permanently.
If Russian gas flows from Nord Stream 1, a 1,224-kilometre pipeline under the Baltic Sea, do not resume, there will be an “intensification of energy-saving measures, higher prices and reduced production in some industries, especially in late autumn and during winter”, across Europe, rating agency Fitch Ratings said last week.
European infrastructure and global supply have coped so far, with a 60% drop in Russian gas deliveries since June 2021. Total gas consumption in the first quarter was down 9% from a year earlier, and alternative supplies are being tapped into, especially liquefied natural gas from global markets.
The IMF working paper said a reduction of up to 70% in Russian gas could be managed in the short term by securing access to alternative supplies and energy sources, given reduced demand as a result of previously high prices, and this explains why some countries could unilaterally halt Russian supplies.
However, diversification would be much harder in the event of a total shutdown, the Washington-based fund said. “Bottlenecks could reduce the ability to reroute gas within Europe because of insufficient import capacity or transmission constraints,” it said.
These factors could lead to shortages equal to 15% to 40% of annual consumption in some countries in central and eastern Europe. The IMF working paper explored the economic impact on Europe resulting from a complete Russian shutdown through two ways.
First is an integrated-market approach that assumes gas can be piped to where it is needed and then prices adjust, while the second is a fragmented-market approach where gas cannot go where it is needed no matter how much prices rise.
If EU markets remain integrated both internally and with the rest of the world, the integrated-market approach suggests that the global LNG market would help to buffer economic impact.
This is because reduced consumption is distributed across all countries connected to the global market, the IMF document said, warning that, “At the extreme [end], assuming no LNG support, the impact is magnified: soaring gas prices would have to work by depressing consumption only in the EU,” the IMF warned.
If infrastructure constraints impede gas flows, the fragmented market model suggests that the negative impact on economic output would be particularly significant — as much as 6% for some countries in central and eastern Europe where Russian gas use is high and alternative supplies are fewer — the paper said.
Italy would also face significant impact due to its high reliance on gas in electricity production. The effects on Austria and Germany would be less severe but still significant, depending on the availability of alternative sources and the ability to lower household gas consumption.
In Germany, the economic impact from a full shutdown would peak next year, then fade as alternative gas supplies become available, the IMF said. Voluntary gas savings by consumers could reduce economic losses by a third while a well-designed rationing plan, which for example lets downstream users and gas-intensive industries bear more of the shortages, could reduce them by up to three fifths, the working paper showed.
“Economic fallout from a Russian gas shutoff can be partially mitigated,” the paper’s authors said.
Governments should focus on risk mitigation and crisis preparedness, as well as boost efforts to secure supplies from global LNG markets and alternative sources, the Fund said.
They should also continue to ease infrastructure bottlenecks to import and distribute gas, make plans to share supplies in an emergency across the EU, act decisively to encourage energy savings and prepare smart gas rationing programmes.
“This is a moment for Europe to build upon the decisive action and solidarity displayed during the pandemic to address the challenging moment it faces today,” the Fund said.
Be the first to know when we publish an update
